<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to My World</title>
	<link>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/447/welcome-to-my-world/</link>
	<description>All About Identity and Entity Resolution</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Zornes</title>
		<link>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/447/welcome-to-my-world/#comment-609</link>
		<author>Aaron Zornes</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/447/welcome-to-my-world/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Analysts "grok" IR as a key technology as well.

http://www.tcdii.com/mdmresearch/assumptions.html#identityresolution

Identity Resolution 

During 2008, independent Data Quality vendors (AddressDoctor, G1, Human Inference, Trillium) will focus on name &#38; address cleansing as they struggle against better funded match/merge &#38; data profiling capabilities increasingly integrated with mega vendor MDM solutions; ongoing challenge will be aggregation of customer data balanced against privacy dictates 

During 2008-09, MDM capabilities for classifying, discovering &#38; archiving party data/relationships while maintaining privacy will become a major requirement; concurrently, users will be challenged to discern the price/performance/scalability &#38; accuracy of matching algorithms; use of cross platform/cross brand customer keys will become core to enabling seamless loyalty programs &#38; online services 

By 2009-10, sophisticated hierarchy management capabilities will include “global IDs” as mainstay feature for all MDM vendors to link both legacy &#38; newly-built hubs with Data Service Providers’ enrichment data; concurrently, support for metadata repositories to link mega vendors’ multitude of acquisitions will continue to significantly lag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analysts &#8220;grok&#8221; IR as a key technology as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tcdii.com/mdmresearch/assumptions.html#identityresolution" rel="nofollow">http://www.tcdii.com/mdmresearch/assumptions.html#identityresolution</a></p>
<p>Identity Resolution </p>
<p>During 2008, independent Data Quality vendors (AddressDoctor, G1, Human Inference, Trillium) will focus on name &amp; address cleansing as they struggle against better funded match/merge &amp; data profiling capabilities increasingly integrated with mega vendor MDM solutions; ongoing challenge will be aggregation of customer data balanced against privacy dictates </p>
<p>During 2008-09, MDM capabilities for classifying, discovering &amp; archiving party data/relationships while maintaining privacy will become a major requirement; concurrently, users will be challenged to discern the price/performance/scalability &amp; accuracy of matching algorithms; use of cross platform/cross brand customer keys will become core to enabling seamless loyalty programs &amp; online services </p>
<p>By 2009-10, sophisticated hierarchy management capabilities will include “global IDs” as mainstay feature for all MDM vendors to link both legacy &amp; newly-built hubs with Data Service Providers’ enrichment data; concurrently, support for metadata repositories to link mega vendors’ multitude of acquisitions will continue to significantly lag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

