<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entity Resolution Metrics</title>
	<link>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/654/entity-resolution-metrics/</link>
	<description>All About Identity and Entity Resolution</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Talburt</title>
		<link>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/654/entity-resolution-metrics/#comment-718</link>
		<author>John Talburt</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/654/entity-resolution-metrics/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Jim,
Thank you. That is an interesting question that I have not fully considered.  It is clear that if E is order dependent then at most only one of the partitions that it produces can be correct.  However it is not clear if an order independent process E would necessarily have a better chance of producing a "more correct" partition.  My first thought is that you could construct examples that work both ways, but I will think about this further.
-jrt-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
Thank you. That is an interesting question that I have not fully considered.  It is clear that if E is order dependent then at most only one of the partitions that it produces can be correct.  However it is not clear if an order independent process E would necessarily have a better chance of producing a &#8220;more correct&#8221; partition.  My first thought is that you could construct examples that work both ways, but I will think about this further.<br />
-jrt-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Zaiss</title>
		<link>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/654/entity-resolution-metrics/#comment-715</link>
		<author>Jim Zaiss</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://identityresolutiondaily.com/654/entity-resolution-metrics/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Suppose that, for a given S, there is a process E such that each possible ordering λi always results in the same partition P.  Can we then conclude – ceteris paribus -- that P is more likely to be the _correct_ partition of S than another partition P’ based on another process E’ such that the λi chosen sometimes results in a different partition of S?

Please excuse me if this is a naïve question, or if it describes a situation that rarely occurs in practice.  I’m new to this particular topic, but find it fascinating.  I’ve long been interested in personal identity issues, though mostly from a logical, metaphysical, or phenomenological perspective. 

Regards,
Jim Zaiss
AWARE Software, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose that, for a given S, there is a process E such that each possible ordering λi always results in the same partition P.  Can we then conclude – ceteris paribus &#8212; that P is more likely to be the _correct_ partition of S than another partition P’ based on another process E’ such that the λi chosen sometimes results in a different partition of S?</p>
<p>Please excuse me if this is a naïve question, or if it describes a situation that rarely occurs in practice.  I’m new to this particular topic, but find it fascinating.  I’ve long been interested in personal identity issues, though mostly from a logical, metaphysical, or phenomenological perspective. </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Jim Zaiss<br />
AWARE Software, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

