Identity Resolution Daily Links 2010-03-23
By the Infoglide Team
Fraud Magazine: Suspicious Activity Reports
“Ultimately, the defendant admitted making numerous deposits of less than $10,000 each to avoid triggering bank filing of the Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) required for all activity involving five figures or more. In a single month, he made nearly 30 such deposits at a number of banks, totaling more than $260,000. Later, in almost 20 transactions at various branches of a single bank, he deposited an additional $185,000. That bank promptly filed a SAR detailing how the mortgage broker had deposited into his personal and business accounts sums ranging from $9,000 to $9,800.”
GCN: State fusion centers look to expand beyond counterterrorism efforts
“The development of fusion centers has faced some significant challenges. First and foremost, the centers must overcome the practical challenge of integrating data. Even in the same state, you can have 500 police departments using different software to manage their [computer-aided design] and intelligence needs,” Serrao said. And generally that data is saved in different formats.”
Community of Experts: Future of MDM – Master Policy Management?
“However, as the thought processes for establishing a business case for MDM mature, we are starting to see where the desire for the unified view is not completely dependent on an instantiation of a single consolidated repository. Instead, in these situations the business needs are supported by the availability of master data services implementing consistent information policies across an extended enterprise… the consistent application of policies can be done both in the presence of a unified repository or as a federated collection of common repositories!”
“As part of the scheme, Minnis allegedly forged and caused others to forge physicians’ signatures on various documents falsely representing that services, treatment, physical therapy and/or testing had been provided, ordered or supervised by medical doctors. Minnis allegedly forged the doctors’ signatures, and caused them to sign reports without having done patient exams, knowing that Workers’ Comp would not accept a chiropractor’s opinions or reports as medical evidence to support patients’ claims.”
Subscribe to this blog